358 lines
13 KiB
TeX
358 lines
13 KiB
TeX
% Options for packages loaded elsewhere
|
|
\PassOptionsToPackage{unicode}{hyperref}
|
|
\PassOptionsToPackage{hyphens}{url}
|
|
%
|
|
\documentclass[
|
|
12pt,
|
|
british,
|
|
a4paper,
|
|
]{article}
|
|
\usepackage{lmodern}
|
|
\usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
|
|
\usepackage{ifxetex,ifluatex}
|
|
\ifnum 0\ifxetex 1\fi\ifluatex 1\fi=0 % if pdftex
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage{textcomp} % provide euro and other symbols
|
|
\else % if luatex or xetex
|
|
\usepackage{unicode-math}
|
|
\defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchLowercase}
|
|
\defaultfontfeatures[\rmfamily]{Ligatures=TeX,Scale=1}
|
|
\setmainfont[]{Times New Roman}
|
|
\fi
|
|
% Use upquote if available, for straight quotes in verbatim environments
|
|
\IfFileExists{upquote.sty}{\usepackage{upquote}}{}
|
|
\IfFileExists{microtype.sty}{% use microtype if available
|
|
\usepackage[]{microtype}
|
|
\UseMicrotypeSet[protrusion]{basicmath} % disable protrusion for tt fonts
|
|
}{}
|
|
\makeatletter
|
|
\@ifundefined{KOMAClassName}{% if non-KOMA class
|
|
\IfFileExists{parskip.sty}{%
|
|
\usepackage{parskip}
|
|
}{% else
|
|
\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
|
|
\setlength{\parskip}{6pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}}
|
|
}{% if KOMA class
|
|
\KOMAoptions{parskip=half}}
|
|
\makeatother
|
|
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
|
\IfFileExists{xurl.sty}{\usepackage{xurl}}{} % add URL line breaks if available
|
|
\IfFileExists{bookmark.sty}{\usepackage{bookmark}}{\usepackage{hyperref}}
|
|
\hypersetup{
|
|
pdftitle={Search for excited quark states decaying to qW/qZ},
|
|
pdfauthor={David Leppla-Weber},
|
|
pdflang={en-GB},
|
|
hidelinks,
|
|
pdfcreator={LaTeX via pandoc}}
|
|
\urlstyle{same} % disable monospaced font for URLs
|
|
\usepackage[top=2.5cm,left=3cm,right=2.5cm,bottom=2.5cm]{geometry}
|
|
\usepackage{listings}
|
|
\newcommand{\passthrough}[1]{#1}
|
|
\lstset{defaultdialect=[5.3]Lua}
|
|
\lstset{defaultdialect=[x86masm]Assembler}
|
|
\setlength{\emergencystretch}{3em} % prevent overfull lines
|
|
\providecommand{\tightlist}{%
|
|
\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}}
|
|
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{5}
|
|
\usepackage[onehalfspacing]{setspace}
|
|
\usepackage{siunitx}
|
|
\usepackage{tikz-feynman}
|
|
\tikzfeynmanset{compat=1.0.0}
|
|
\pagenumbering{gobble}
|
|
\ifxetex
|
|
% Load polyglossia as late as possible: uses bidi with RTL langages (e.g. Hebrew, Arabic)
|
|
\usepackage{polyglossia}
|
|
\setmainlanguage[variant=british]{english}
|
|
\else
|
|
\usepackage[shorthands=off,main=british]{babel}
|
|
\fi
|
|
\usepackage[]{biblatex}
|
|
|
|
\title{Search for excited quark states decaying to qW/qZ}
|
|
\author{David Leppla-Weber}
|
|
\date{}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
\maketitle
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
This is my very long abstract.
|
|
|
|
Blubb
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
|
|
\tableofcontents
|
|
}
|
|
\newpage
|
|
\pagenumbering{arabic}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{introduction}{%
|
|
\section{Introduction}\label{introduction}}
|
|
|
|
\newpage
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{theoretical-background}{%
|
|
\section{Theoretical background}\label{theoretical-background}}
|
|
|
|
This chapter presents a short summary of the theoretical background
|
|
relevant to this thesis. It first gives introduction to the standard
|
|
model itself and some of the issues it raises. It then goes on to
|
|
explain the processes of quantum chromodynamics and the theory of q*,
|
|
which will be the main topic of this thesis.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{standard-model}{%
|
|
\subsection{Standard model}\label{standard-model}}
|
|
|
|
The Standard Model of physics proofed very successful in describing
|
|
three of the four fundamental interactions currently known: the
|
|
electromagnetic, weak and strong interaction. The fourth, gravity, could
|
|
not yet be successfully included in this theory.
|
|
|
|
The Standard Model divides all particles into spin-\(\frac{n}{2}\)
|
|
fermions and spin-n bosons, where n could be any integer but so far is
|
|
only known to be one for fermions and either one (gauge bosons) or zero
|
|
(scalar bosons) for bosons. The fermions are further divided into quarks
|
|
and leptons, both of which exist in three generations.
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\tightlist
|
|
\item
|
|
issues
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{quantum-chromodynamics}{%
|
|
\subsection{Quantum Chromodynamics}\label{quantum-chromodynamics}}
|
|
|
|
The quantum chromodynamics (QCD) describe the strong interaction of
|
|
particles. It applies to all particles carrying colour (e.g.~quarks).
|
|
The force is mediated by the gluons. Those bosons carry colour as well
|
|
and can therefore interact with themselves. As a result of this,
|
|
processes, where a gluon decays into two gluons are possible.
|
|
Furthermore the strong force, binding to colour carrying particles,
|
|
increases with their distance r making it impossible to separate two
|
|
bound particles and causing the effect of hadronisation, which describes
|
|
the process of hadrons forming out of individual, colour carrying,
|
|
particles.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{excited-quark-states}{%
|
|
\subsection{Excited quark states}\label{excited-quark-states}}
|
|
|
|
One category of theories that try to solve some of the shortcomings of
|
|
the standard model are the composite quark models. Those state, that
|
|
quarks consist of some particles unknown to us so far. A common
|
|
prediction of those models are excited quark states (q*, q**,
|
|
q***\ldots). This thesis will search data of the years 2016, 2017 and
|
|
2018 for the single excited quark state q* which decays to a quark and
|
|
any boson. As the boson will also quickly decay to for example two
|
|
quarks, those events will be hard to distinguish from the QCD background
|
|
described in \ldots.
|
|
|
|
\feynmandiagram [horizontal=a to b] {
|
|
i1 -- [fermion] a -- [fermion] i2,
|
|
a -- [photon] b,
|
|
f1 -- [fermion] b -- [fermion] f2,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{experimental-setup}{%
|
|
\section{Experimental Setup}\label{experimental-setup}}
|
|
|
|
Following on, the experimental setup used to gather the data analysed in
|
|
this thesis will be described.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{large-hadron-collider}{%
|
|
\subsection{Large Hadron Collider}\label{large-hadron-collider}}
|
|
|
|
The Large Hadron Collider is the world's largest and most powerful
|
|
particle accelerator \autocite{website}. It has a perimeter of 27 km and
|
|
can collide protons at a centre of mass energy of 13 TeV. It is home to
|
|
several experiments, the biggest of those are ATLAS and CMS. Both are
|
|
general-purpose detectors to investigate the particles that form during
|
|
particle collisions.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{cms}{%
|
|
\subsection{CMS}\label{cms}}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{the-particle-flow-algorithm}{%
|
|
\subsubsection{The Particle Flow
|
|
algorithm}\label{the-particle-flow-algorithm}}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{jet-clustering}{%
|
|
\subsubsection{Jet clustering}\label{jet-clustering}}
|
|
|
|
Because of the hadronisation it is not possible to uniquely identify the
|
|
originating particle of a jet. Nonetheless, several algorithms exist to
|
|
help with this problem. The algorithm used in this thesis is the
|
|
anti-\(k_t\) clustering algorithm. It arises from a generalization of
|
|
several other clustering algorithms, namely the \(k_t\),
|
|
Cambridge/Aachen and SISCone clustering algorithms.
|
|
|
|
The anti-\(k_t\) clustering algorithm associates hard particles with
|
|
their soft particles surrounding them within a radius R in the \(\eta\)
|
|
- \(\phi\) plane forming cone like jets. If two jets overlap, the jets
|
|
shape is changed according to its hardness. A softer particles jet will
|
|
change its shape more than a harder particles. A visual comparision of
|
|
four different clustering algorithms can be seen in \ldots.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{method-of-analysis}{%
|
|
\section{Method of analysis}\label{method-of-analysis}}
|
|
|
|
As described in \ldots, an excited quark q* can decay to a quark and any
|
|
boson. The branching ratios are calculated to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
The majority of excited quarks will decay to a quark and a gluon, but as
|
|
this is virtually impossible to distinguish from QCD effects (for
|
|
example from the qg-\textgreater qg processes), this analysis will focus
|
|
on the processes q\emph{-\textgreater qW and q}-\textgreater qZ. As the
|
|
vector bosons quickly decay mainly into two quarks, it will still be
|
|
hard to discriminate between signal and qcd background events, but due
|
|
to jet substructure studies it is well possible to establish a
|
|
discriminator.
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\tightlist
|
|
\item
|
|
dominant background: QCD (gg-gg e.g.~- two jets)
|
|
\item
|
|
division in QCD bg and signal
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{signalbackground-modelling}{%
|
|
\subsection{Signal/Background
|
|
modelling}\label{signalbackground-modelling}}
|
|
|
|
Following on, as background a QCD Monte Carlo sample will be used and as
|
|
signal a Monte Carlo sample of q* decaying to qW/qZ.
|
|
|
|
The background is fitted using the following function with three
|
|
parameters p0, p1, p2: \begin{equation}
|
|
\frac{dN}{dm_{jj}} = \frac{p_0 \cdot ( 1 - m_{jj} / \sqrt{s} )^{p_2}}{ (m_{jj} / \sqrt{s})^{p_1}} \end{equation}
|
|
Whereas \(m_{jj}\) is the invariant mass of the dijet and \(p_0\) is a
|
|
normalisation parameter. Two and four parameter functions have also been
|
|
studied but found to not fit the background as good as this one.
|
|
|
|
The signal is fitted using a double sided crystal ball function. A
|
|
gaussian and a poisson have also been studied but found to not fit the
|
|
signal sample very well.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{event-selection}{%
|
|
\section{Event selection}\label{event-selection}}
|
|
|
|
The selection of events is divided in two parts. First, the preselection
|
|
is optimized for high trigger efficiency and makes some physically
|
|
motivated cuts. After that, a jet substructure selection uses different
|
|
taggers to discriminate between QCD and signal events.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{preselection}{%
|
|
\subsection{Preselection}\label{preselection}}
|
|
|
|
The preselection introduces the following cuts:
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\def\labelenumi{\arabic{enumi}.}
|
|
\tightlist
|
|
\item
|
|
Number of jets \(\ge\) 2
|
|
\item
|
|
\(\Delta\eta \le 1.3\)
|
|
\item
|
|
\(m_{jj} \ge \SI{1050}{\giga\eV}\)
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
In the final state, at least two jets are expected. One directly
|
|
originating from the decaying q* particle, the other one from the
|
|
decaying vector boson. The resonance mass of the q* particle is expected
|
|
to be very high, therefore it will be almost stationary and decay into
|
|
two particles that are approximately back to back. That is ensured by
|
|
the \(\Delta\eta\) cut. The last cut of the invariant dijet mass is to
|
|
improve trigger efficiency.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{datamc-comparision}{%
|
|
\subsection{Data/MC Comparision}\label{datamc-comparision}}
|
|
|
|
To ensure high data quality, the MC QCD background sample is now being
|
|
compared to the actual data of the corresponding data. This is done for
|
|
all three years of data available in Run2.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{event-substructure-selection}{%
|
|
\section{Event substructure
|
|
selection}\label{event-substructure-selection}}
|
|
|
|
This selection is responsible for distinguishing between QCD and signal
|
|
events by using a tagger to identify jets coming from a vector boson.
|
|
Two taggers different taggers will be used to later compare the results.
|
|
For each tagger, a softdropmass is introduced.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{sideband}{%
|
|
\subsection{Sideband}\label{sideband}}
|
|
|
|
The sideband is introduced to make sure there are no unwanted side
|
|
effects of the used cut. It adds a cut, that makes sure, no data in the
|
|
sideband is used for the actual analysis. Later on, a cut on the
|
|
softdropmass will be used. The sideband is the softdropmass cut
|
|
reversed.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{n-subjettiness}{%
|
|
\subsection{N-Subjettiness}\label{n-subjettiness}}
|
|
|
|
The N-subjettiness \(\tau_n\) is defined as
|
|
|
|
\begin{equation} \tau_N = \frac{1}{d_0} \sum_k p_{T,k} \cdot \text{min}\{ \Delta R_{1,k}, \Delta R_{2,k}, …, \Delta
|
|
R_{N,k} \} \end{equation}
|
|
|
|
with k going over the constituent particles in a given jet, \(p_{T,k}\)
|
|
being their transverse momenta and
|
|
\(\Delta R_{J,k} = \sqrt{(\Delta\eta)^2 + (\Delta\phi)^2}\) being the
|
|
distance of a candidate subjet J and a constituent particle k in the
|
|
rapidity-azimuth plane. It has been shown, that
|
|
\(\tau_{21} = \tau_2/\tau_1\) is a good discriminator between QCD events
|
|
and events originating from the decay of a boosted vector boson.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{deepboosted}{%
|
|
\subsection{DeepBoosted}\label{deepboosted}}
|
|
|
|
The deep boosted tagger uses a trained neural network to identify decays
|
|
originitating in a vector boson. It is supposed to give better
|
|
efficiencies than the older N-Subjettiness method.
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{optimization}{%
|
|
\subsection{Optimization}\label{optimization}}
|
|
|
|
To figure out the best value to cut on the discriminators introduced by
|
|
the two taggers, a value to quantify how good a cut is has to be
|
|
introduced. For that, the significance calculated by
|
|
\(\frac{S}{\sqrt{B}}\) will be used. S stands for the amount of signal
|
|
events and B for the amount of background events in a given interval.
|
|
This value assumes a gaussian error on the background so it will be
|
|
calculated for the 2 TeV masspoint where enough background events exist
|
|
to justify this assumption. The value therefore represents how good the
|
|
signal can be distinguished from the background in units of the standard
|
|
deviation of the background. As interval, a 10 \% margin around the
|
|
masspoint is chosen.
|
|
|
|
As a result, the \(\tau_{21}\) cut is placed at \(\le 0.35\) and the
|
|
VvsQCD cut is placed at \(\ge 0.83\).
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{signal-extraction}{%
|
|
\section{Signal extraction}\label{signal-extraction}}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{uncertainties}{%
|
|
\subsection{Uncertainties}\label{uncertainties}}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{results}{%
|
|
\section{Results}\label{results}}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{section}{%
|
|
\subsection{2016}\label{section}}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{previous-research}{%
|
|
\subsubsection{previous research}\label{previous-research}}
|
|
|
|
\hypertarget{section-1}{%
|
|
\subsection{2016 + 2017 + 2018}\label{section-1}}
|
|
|
|
\printbibliography[title=Summary]
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|